Niagara Falls not that wonderful?
Thu, July 23, 2009
Tourism officials on the U.S. side of Niagara Falls said they passed on the opportunity to be among the New 7 Wonders of Nature nominees because of worries their cash-strapped community might be on the hook for costly promotional activities, though a spokesperson for New 7 Wonders said worries were unfounded.
Canadian tourism officials had formed the required supporting committee to make Niagara Falls eligible for the poll, but without American support the bi-national attraction was taken out of the running. Read the full story here.
Do you think Niagara Falls was robbed of a chance to be among the New 7 Wonders of Nature? Should the New 7 Wonders organization have allowed Niagara Falls to be considered without American support? Is Niagara Falls even a good enough attraction to have been included in the competition against other waterfalls like Iguazu Falls? Sound off below!
|
ClibiaAbala, 2009-08-29 03:06:01
Steve, 2009-07-24 20:45:05
robert cooper, 2009-07-24 19:21:41
By reducing the amount of water going over the Falls, we are preventing the erosion that inevitably will happen.
Look at the Falls, as you stand at the brink, from the american side or canadian.
I am in awe.
heather, 2009-07-24 15:46:56
Jack, 2009-07-24 14:26:42
This was a commercial venture, and it makes for a (slightly) provocative story. Above it all, the roar of the Fallx remains a true wonder of nature...right in our backyard.
Greg, 2009-07-24 14:19:47
anon, 2009-07-24 13:53:18
Helen T., 2009-07-24 13:12:54
alan, 2009-07-24 12:57:32
Do some research before posting such erroneous information please.
shonline, 2009-07-24 10:26:15